Latest Updates: obama RSS

  • Children Will Listen

    MJ 10:14 am on January 30, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , gop, obama

    “Careful the things you say
    Children will listen
    Careful the things you do
    Children will see and learn
    Children may not obey, but children will listen
    Children will look to you for which way to turn
    To learn what to be
    Careful before you say ‘Listen to me’
    Children will listen.”

    ~from the musical, “Into the Woods”

    I first heard this song when I was a freshman in high school. A teacher at the time emphasized how important this song is, but just like any good story, the more I am exposed to it, the more I see its significance.

    It’s hard sometimes, to be an adult in a middle school. I struggled this week, more than most, with this dilemma. It’s hard to not have a very human reaction to another’s very human, albeit annoying, action. But does that really solve anything? When a student yells at me because he feels like he’s not getting what he wants, it’s hard not to respond with an elevated voice and firmer tone. It’s hard to respond civilly when incivility is in the air.

    Obama carried the same theme in both the State of the Union this week and his Q&A with the House GOP in Baltimore. Regardless of one’s opinion about Obama and his policies, I think we can all agree that what he says about the tone of politics today — that it is poisonous and unproductive. The same strategies to change that tone are present outside of politics — in our interpersonal relationships, in our classrooms, our families, and in our workplaces. The main question is: who’s listening and what will they learn from me?

    In SOTU, President Obama said, ”Washington may think that saying anything about the other side, no matter how false, no matter how malicious, is just part of the game.  But it’s precisely such politics that has stopped either party from helping the American people.  Worse yet, it’s sowing further division among our citizens, further distrust in our government.”

    To the House GOP, in a very candid tone while responding to a question, POTUS said, “[Politicians] have to be careful about what we say about one another.” He continued that a “tone of civility” was needed, “instead of slash and burn. The problem is, we have a media that responds to slash and burn.”

    He also said two very important things about education this week: that it is the greatest “anti-poverty program of the 21st century” and that ”In this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than their potential.”

    Combining these ideas, the lesson should be:

    children will listen. They do. The tone in Washington and the politics of very important politics affect how Americans, and our children, think about their government and our society. In- and outside of politics, we are all role models for each other. It is our choice whether to be positive or negative in those roles. Either way, people are watching and, especially are children, are following.

    In my classroom, I know I need to do a better job of being consistently positive and mature with ALL students, regardless of how they are treating me. Why? As a consistent adult in their life, I am a model for how civil and mature behavior looks and acts. I am a model of the results of quality education and determined problem solving. If I model divergent behavior, what I am a teaching them?

    The same goes for politics. This web site is designed for a group of party-minded individuals. The leader of this party, our president, expressed a position this past week, and arguably since the beginning of the campaign in 2007, that party labels do not matter: that our identity as Americans matters most when it comes to discussing and instituting policy. It’s a shame that the misinformation, fear-mongering, and name-calling side of our politics gets the most play on TV. But really, if we were more productive in our politics-less policy-making, wouldn’t that be different, too?

    We need to consistently project a tone of civility and honor to expect that that’s what people, media included, will respond to. We can’t solve our nation’s–and our world’s–greatest problems by pointing fingers, calling names, and screaming. Democracy is meant to be noisy, but we need make sure our noise is respectful and productive. In this vein, it’s not the Republicans that are the root of our greatest problems, or that disruptive student in my classroom — it’s our actions, our response to their actions, and our leadership in guiding everyone toward a common, agreeable goal.

    It is a very human response to place blame and express equal–if not, immature–ferocity when we feel cornered in the same way. But, wouldn’t it be more mature, and more powerful, to turn that ferocity to positivity? As hard as it is to be the bigger person sometimes, we need to take the high road. This is because solutions are so much more important than harping on what the problems are; this is important because, unless we model for each other what active, mature problem-solving looks like, we can’t expect that future generations can learn to do the same from us.

    We can’t keep waiting for our children to solve our problems; we need to do that ourselves, and teach our children the appropriate tools to solve the problems they will face.

    As we move forward into this new decade, remember: what are you doing? Who’s watching? Who’s listening? What will they learn from you in that process? It’s an approach I must stick to in my classroom, and one we should focus on as a country, if we expect to solve any of the problems before us.

    ~MJ

    “These were the times that tested the courage of our convictions, and the strength of our union.  And despite all our divisions and disagreements, our hesitations and our fears, America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, as one people….

    “To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve problems, not run for the hills.  And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that 60 votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town — a supermajority — then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well.   Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it’s not leadership.  We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions.  So let’s show the American people that we can do it together. ~POTUS, 2010 SOTU

     
  • One Year Later :: Drinking Liberally

    Dillon Doyle 4:06 pm on November 1, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: drinking liberaly, , jordans, libations, obama, one year leater

    A little more than one year after WE elected Obama we have accomplished a lot. While there is still too much to do, let’s celebrate our great achievements.

    Join us this Thursday November 5h at Jordans Pub at 7p for librations and food!

     
  • Is the Obama White House selling out millions of people for...nothing?

    John McMahon 3:27 pm on October 23, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , obama, selling out,

    Lots of news today that the Obama White House is pressuring the Senate negotiators to DROP a compromise on health care reform that would allow states to opt-out of a relatively robust public option. This is after the opt-out idea has been receiving increased public support, among both liberal and conservative Democratic Senators.

    That’s right, the Obama administration is trying to get Senate, thus far a slow-moving and obstinate body, to drop a compromise that would cover more people in a more cost-effective way that their preferred alternative, Olympia Snowe’s weak ‘trigger’ proposal that would do little to foster affordability and has essentially been off the table for a while due to a lack of support. Why, you are likely asking, is the Obama administration doing this? Good question, with a disappointing and maddening answer: because they are reportedlyobsessed” with getting the support of Sen. Olympia Snowe, a Republican from Maine.

    So, to recap, the Obama administration appears to prefer a weaker, less effective approach to health care reform just so they get one (ONE!?) Republican vote, that they don’t even need. This absolutely is not change that anyone should believe in.

    People (including myself and many of us who blog here and are members of this organization) did NOT volunteer and spend time getting Obama elected President to give a Republican Senator from Maine de facto veto power over legislation. That, friends, is not change, and anyone who is fooled to believe it is needs a reality check.

    If this is really the approach that the White House wants to pursue, then I hope they think hard about selling out and violating the trust of millions of hard-working people who would like to have access to health care, just so they can satisfy their fetish of getting a single irrelevant Republican vote.

    Put pressure on the Obama administration however you can (call and email the WH, tweet, facebook, etc.) to support a robust public option.

     
  • Well, if Obama says it...

    MJ 9:32 am on September 11, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , obama

    It must be true.

    Lesson #1 from my experience in a newsroom: you can’t believe what you see on TV.

    However, I felt like President Obama’s speech to the nation’s school children was one of those rare exceptions. My validation? It’s a speech the likes of which I give to my students every day.

    I feel like a paraphrased version of the following passage comes up constantly in my classroom:

    ” …none of it will matter unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities, unless you show up to those schools, unless you pay attention to those teachers, unless you listen to your parents and grandparents and other adults and put in the hard work it takes to succeed. “

    The bolded phrase is very important, as it goes directly with my classroom rule mantra: All scholars are welcome to their rights as long as they uphold their responsibilities and do not interfere with the rights of others.

    Those responsibilities? The same Obama spoke of: respect, hard work, and perseverance (in so many words).

    So, when I planned my “Obama Lesson,” I thought that it would be the key to my students’ investment in their scholarship. If I feel like a broken record, maybe the new, updated, shiny, presidential record will resonate.

    Maybe it did. I cannot be sure because the discussion following the speech felt passionless, cliche, and absurdly boring. Even if he did, he is not in my classroom every day.

    I need to work on my execution, but if a man most of my students absolutely adore can’t spark their “I Can” and “I Will” belief in their own education, what can I do?

    My students were the ones Obama mentioned in his speech; some don’t have stable home lives, some don’t have parents who speak English, and many have personal issues that can distract them from the classroom.

    About 50% of each of my class rosters are completely new this week. All of them are working on letters to the president or to Principal Mericier about their educational goals and issues that they care about. It’s what I could think of helping them to focus their talents, their abilities, and their potential all along Language Arts lines.

    Obama’s speech to school children said exactly what needed to be said. I will keep saying it, but I also need to make sure I’m helping my students start believing it.

    It’s a new day with these classes. How can I give them the spark to get their educational fire burning?

    ~MJ

     
  • Van Jones’s Resignation: Cowering in Front of the Real Crazies

    John McMahon 3:59 pm on September 8, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , extremism, , obama, , van jones

    Author’s Note: This was originally written for the Sept. 10 issue of [dis]claimer, which will be available at the Pioneer Carnival on Saturday and all over campus on Monday. Also cross-posted at the Colorado Progressive Voice.

    In the early hours of September 6, former Special Advisor for Green Jobs in the Obama White House, Van Jones, resigned his position after controversy, led by Glenn Beck, over supposedly controversial comments in Jones’s past. As the controversy intensified in the preceding days, the Obama administration provided little to no support for Jones before his resignation, and offered little regret in its aftermath. By conceding victory to the individuals and groups behind the real extremism and racism in opposition to Obama (Obama is not American; Obama is a Nazi Communist Black Muslim; Obama’s ‘death panels,’ etc.), the White House has not only pushed out one of the few true ‘movement progressives’ in the Administration, but also cowered in front of the real crazies. (More …)

     
  • introduction

    gordonbronson 8:54 am on July 3, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: capital, DC, DU Dems, Gordon, Interior, obama

    Dillon, fearless leader of the DU Dems, asked that I post an occasional update during my tenure here in our nations capital. I’ve been meaning to jot this down sooner but settling into my new job has taken quite a lot out of me. I’m working at the Department of the Interior (which is actually a cabinet member, not as glamorous as State of Defense but hey, we own ¼ of the land in US) in the office of congressional and legislative affairs. Basically OCL is the Secretary of the Interiors voice to congress. But right now, its Friday the 3rd, and since tomorrow is happy birthday America day, today is a federal holiday. My plan today is to finish this lil’ blog post and then maybe don some pants, maybe. After a long weekspent in a suit and tie come the weekend it takes a lot for me to cover my loins. But as it is a holiday weekend I’m gonna break out of my cramped Georgetown apartment and mosey down to the national mall in search of a slushy.

    Working for President Obama aint too bad.

     
  • Petition To CO Senators To Increase Pell Grants

    Dillon Doyle 6:55 am on June 16, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Bennet, , obama, Obama Education, Pell grant, , Udall

    Dear Senator Udall and Senator Bennet,

    Thank you so much for your continued interest in supporting college students to get a college degree. We know that the Senate is considering making a big investment in the Pell grant it order to help students get into college and stay there. We encourage you to vote in favor of a bill this summer that will invest in students.

    A college degree is practically a necessity these days, but rising costs and the sour economy are making it harder to pay for it!

    In February, President Obama proposed a dramatic reinvestment in the financial aid system that we rely on to pay for college. He would significantly boost college grant aid so college students could graduate without a mountain of debt to repay. His plan would also allow hundreds of thousands of more students to qualify for the Pell grant. Nationally, close to 8 million students currently use the grant to help pay for college, and at least 80,148 do in our state. Even more of us could use access grant aid to help relieve the burden of loan debt. The president’s plan would also reliably increase the maximum each year – instead of the Pell grant award being a mystery from year to year, we could actually count on a set amount and plan to pay for school accordingly.

    We have personal stories about the negative impact of student loans and we have friends who’ve struggled too. Be it the qualified student who chooses not to attend college because of cost, those who work well over 15 hours a week to pay for school on top of their academics, or the graduate who wants to teach or go into some other lower paying career but cannot due to high student loan repayments, the consequences of the lack of adequate financial aid are only worsened as our parent’s jobs and our own part time jobs disappear.

    To make the significant increase to grant aid, you will have to cut excessive subsidies that go to support bank participation in the student loan programs. Banks are fighting back; just last week, Citibank sent an email to the millions of student loan borrowers it services urging that the borrowers contact their legislators in support of the bank subsidies.

    We are not banks, we are students. We ask you to hear us and to hear our families. Please support the biggest student aid increase possible.

    Sincerely,
    Colorado students

    To sign the petition head on over to http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=88162145381

     
  • Education: The Executive Branch Edition

    MJ 9:42 am on June 15, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , obama

     

    “Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, because it will take nothing less to compete in the global economy. Michelle and I are only here tonight because we were given a chance at an education. And I will not settle for an America where some kids don’t have that chance. I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. And in exchange, I’ll ask for higher standards and more accountability. And we will keep our promise to every young American - if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make sure you can afford a college education.”

    ~then-Sen. Barack Obama, accepting the Democratic nomination for President

    One of Obama’s promises for change has regarded education. His promises include (source: “Expanding the Promise of Education”):

     

    • Recovery for schools that are failing under the standards set by No Child Left Behind
    • Investment in charter schools
    • Better tracking of students’ path through education; teachers’ effectiveness
    • Higher pay as a reward for high-performing teachers (similar to the philosophy behind Denver’s ProComp system)
    • Investment in early-childhood education, especially “Zero to Five” developmental programs

    After the first 100+ days, what has been done?

    Based on his promises, the Obama plan for education is only beginning. I’d say this is a good start, but the benefits of it may not be seen immediately.

    No Child Left Behind changed the landscape of American education when it was passed in 2001. The idea that American schools should follow certain standards is not a bad one, but the NCLB also opened the door to further fragmentation of resources for schools.

    One of the strongest tenants of NCLB is school choice; when a school is determined to not be meeting standards, they are put on a school improvement list. When on this list, the school must offer all students the opportunity, including help with costs, to attend another school that is not on the list. Less students, in many cases, means less money to spend on school resources. Still, in this framework, a school is expected to design a plan to make it off the improvement list.

    Most simply, the set up gives less to schools that already have less to begin with. 

    Obama’s investment in education, in both capital and human terms, is an important one. However, real reform in education will come from rethinking the way we think about education. We don’t only need an army of teachers, higher standards, and more accountability. We need stronger investments in resources and in opportunities for all students. Even if we have to operate under a system of standards, under-performing schools shouldn’t be monetarily punished for missing the mark. Making a plan to meet the standards is important, and schools must be offered adequate resources to do so.

    Most importantly, we shouldn’t rely on Obama to completely change the face of education. In fact, we shouldn’t rely on government. Government should play an important role in funding, but there are more important stakeholders in American education. Teachers, administrators, parents, families, neighbors, and most importantly: students. Reform doesn’t have to be completely dictated by the government sitting in Washington, but it should include communities close to the school.

    We all have a reason to improve education: in some way, we, and everything we do, is a product of the education system. If it is sub-par, then we have to know that we are not in the best position to make other changes this country desperately needs. Put in that light, Kennedy’s words are most important: “Ask not what this country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

    The executive branch is doing important things with education, and has a lot more to do. I have made it a point to invest myself in American education as a Teach for America teacher, along with 4000+ new corps members. That is only the beginning, though. One doesn’t have to be a teacher to make a difference, though. So, what will you do?

    ~MJ

     
  • Sotomayor: It's a Latina thing...

    Javi 6:19 pm on June 9, 2009 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Latina, Nomination, obama, , , Supreme Court

    On May 26, 2009, President Barack Hussein Obama announced his Supreme Court nominee. Since this date, there is hardly a day that goes by without mention of Sonia Sotomayor, possibly the first Latina (o) to ever serve in the high court. Since the announcement, Sotomayor has received mixed reviews. Some champion her strengths and the need to have a court that better represents modern America (i.e. having a Hispanic woman versus a White man). Others claim that Sotomayor has little experience to sit on the court. They claim she would unfairly use race when considering her decisions. They would have us believe that the only reason President Obama nominated her is to “diversify” the court. In some sense, I guess I would agree that her race was an important consideration in the nomination. However, I would argue that the experience is there.

    Sotomayor grew up in the Bronx of New York City. Early on, she showed a passion for learning which lead to her enrollment at Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude, an impressive distinction. Shortly later, she enrolled at Yale Law School. At this point, Sotomayor’s path to the high court began. If Obama’s nomination is confirmed, Sotomayor will have been nominated by three out of the last four Presidents. In 1991, she was nominated by President George H. W. Bush to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. After several years, she was nominated by President Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In this court, she has heard more than 3,000 cases and written more than 350 opinions. In addition to the experience of the courts, Sotomayor has taught at the New York University School of Law as well as Columbia Law School. Keeping in mind the three nominations she has received, it’s evident that experience is there.

    For opponents who would argue that race is too large of a consideration in the Sotomayor nomination, I would say it should be. Obama’s promise of change is about realizing how modern America has become. Since its inception, this country has always been a mixing of many people. Despite this great mix, it’s always been run the same way. Two years ago, I would not have believed that my next President would be African American. Today, I am proud of the men and women who helped change America in a big way. Hopefully, Sonia Sotomayor will be the first Latina to sit on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor’s race is an asset to the court and to all Americans. People should realize that America is changing. So many times, we, as a nation, struggle to look past the differences of race. Even the fact that many believe Sotomayor will only be in the Court because she is Latina shows us this. If race was indeed a consideration in her nomination, I’d like to say it’s about time. It’s time for us to have someone who is able to reconcile the task of the job at hand with the same experience faced by so many in our country. An experience undeniably different from any other Justice in history. A Hispanic experience.

    As a Latino striving to secure my own educational success, I was very happy to hear about the nomination. It shows me that I will not be held back from opportunity because of the color of my skin or the character of my heritage. Considering Sotomayor, she is an impressive woman. She has demonstrated her merit. Being a woman of color with her own unique experiences and views, she will add a much needed voice to the Supreme Court. As a woman, the power of advocacy within the Court grows. As a racial minority in this country, the power of possibility ignites. At this day in my life, I can honestly say that I see my country changing around me. Never before has my generation seen the power of the American dream like we did last November. My only hope is that it’s allowed to continue.

     
  • From a Higher Place

    MJ 10:16 am on May 31, 2009 | 2 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , obama,

    Graduation is fast approaching and instead of writing that last paper, I decided I’d take a moment to kick off this blog…about education.

    I have spent 17 years in Colorado education, from Adams County School District 50 (in Westminster) to a fine private institution, the University of Denver. In all of those years, I have developed a firm belief in people and in the power of civic engagement.

    These beliefs have been shaped by my experiences in education, and are ones I will continue to fall back on as I enter Teach for America as a corps member in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

    DU’s potential new brand will include the slogan, “from a higher place.” Without debating the implicit meanings of that phrase, I do feel the meaning of it. After four years of an expensive education (thank you, large scholarship!) I am re-entering the world of low education with a unique perspective. 

    In that vein, I have goals for this blog experience, for me, and for you:

    1. To translate that perspective into this blog;
    2. To talk about issues in America’s public education system, and tools to resolve them; and
    3. To encourage all DU Pioneers to use their education to change the world.

    I hope to include pictures, maybe some video along with my writing. I also hope you all comment — whether to agree, or push back — on my thoughts.

    My next post will include a discussion on the Obama platform on education. It’s a Democratic plan, but is it a democratic solution? And what does this plan mean in a post-No Child Left Behind world?

    In the meantime, let’s finish our finals!

    ~MJ

    University of Denver ‘09

    Journalism Studies/Political Science

    former AHUM Senator and Chair of Sustainability, AUSA

    future teacher!

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel