Latest Updates: DU RSS

  • I Support Sodexo Workers

    Dillon Doyle 7:32 am on January 9, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: button, DU, sodexo, student activism, union

    Together in action, students and Sodexo workers will fight for respect and a living wage

    Please visit http://dillondoyle.com/sodexo/ for more information

    Many workers have expressed their concern. Concern for respect and a living wage , concern over the quality of food that they serve to us. It is time we all took a stand.

    Will you stand with Sodexo workers and fight for respect and a living wage?

    We will be showing our support for workers by wearing buttons to the dining halls. Starting on Monday the 11th, we need you to help hand out buttons at the dining halls. We will be there until that Thursday, and without your help it won't be successful.

    Signup to help today and show your support for the loving hard working people that literally feed us!

     
  • Where I Have Been

    Dillon Doyle 11:14 am on November 17, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apathy, bill, c-span, DU, healthcare, house, ineptitude, poignant, , update, win

    This was emailed out to a certain committee of mine, but I think it applies here to:

    It has been a long time since I last blogged, so I thought that I would this week explain what a poignant ride the past few weeks have been for me.

    History is not linear; while the arc of history may bend towards what is just and right, without constant vigilance and substantial effort we will not be successful in attaining what we seek.

    As I find my myself watching the House healthcare vote on C-Span, this notion proves itself evident: we have made extreme and great leaps towards health care reform, but not all is as it should be. The Stupak amendment passed, there is no strong and robust public option, and reform is far from single payer. However, I have recently learned that in order to have the energy and will to keep fighting it is necessary to revel in success and frame our substantial progress as a basis for change in the future.

    I have recently been struggling with the gross ineptitude and apathy of our campus; without failure (ha) at the end of every quarter I become so jaded and disheartened by my fellow students that I become very negative in my expressions. I constantly struggle to stave off my building despondence.

    I have come to realize that this, focus on the negative, in the long run is not as effective as a more balanced viewpoint. I personally need to realize the great and positive changes that have been made while still working to improve and protect upon what we have.

    In the past few weeks, I learned that I need to focus on the journey as I seek to fulfill my future and the same is true for each and everyone of you. During this process it is important to realize that everyday is special, and that everyday we have all made a difference. Similar to healthcare reform, we must revel in our successes in order to keep going. For without noticing and living the steps along the way, and the positive changes associated with them, myself and all of us will further become disheartened with our situations.

    I guess what I am trying to say is that we must not be discouraged and we must not give up. I have lately been struggling (as I always do towards the end of a quarter) to gather the strength needed to continue what often times feels like ineffective and unappreciated work. It is important to realize this is not true. Everyday we all make positive change, and everyday somebody’s life is better because of it.

    When we strive (and struggle) to become better than we are, everyone around us becomes better too. It is with this mindset that we must go forward, reveling in our victories, while working to protect and expand upon what we have accomplished. We must not give up in the fight for what is just and right. We must work everyday to better our school and community.

    With continued and vigilant effort, we will win.

     
  • The Impending Tsunami

    Dillon Doyle 3:11 pm on July 17, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , budget crisis, colorado, DU, interview, jeffrey roberts, report, transcript, tsunami

    Today I sat down with Jeffrey Roberts the author of the article I referenced in my last post about the Colorado state budget crisis (or as Roberts would like it to be known, the impending tsunami). Roberts is a part of the Center for Colorado’s Economic Future at DU.

    Roberts primarily stressed what the report laid out; because of the many entangling constitutional amendments and laws, we as a state have committed ourselves to ever increasing funding whilst simultaneously limiting the amount of revenue we can take in (spending is dramatically outpacing income).

    The report as filled didn’t delve into scrupulousness information on corrections, which is according to the report one of the top three sources of costs coming from the General Fund.

    When asked about the impact of corrections, and ever rising incarceration rates, Roberts responded with a surprising answer (I think to both of us). According to the most recent Legislative Council projections, the rate at which incarcerations are increasing has slowed down. The opposite of what I had expected. While this report was filled before the economic downturn has taken full effect, it is nonetheless shocking .

    Roberts “was a little surprised to see that they have cut their growth rate projection” but it is “still costly, and that’s something they [legislators] have been dealing with”.

    When asked about the effect that cessation of the rhetoric of the “war on drugs” has had, and thus a hopefully fundamental shift in the way in which we deal with drugs in America, Roberts was vague. “I can’t really speak to that, and I don’t know that we would see any of that quite yet anyway.”.

    One of the most striking sentiments expressed was Robert’s thoughts on the rising costs of education in relation to the budget crisis.

    When asked about TABOR Roberts of course stayed away from partisanship, “our center is a non-partisan center, we don’t really advocate for or against [policy]”.

    Interestingly I tried to clarify thoughts on education spending (Amendment 23) and the effect TABOR has on this; I asked “would you characterize this as more of a broken revenue system instead of an education funding problem” to which Roberts responded “Overall I think its kind of a broken revenue system.” Do with that what you will.

    When filled, the report stated in reference to fiscal year 2010-2011 “that’s when people are expected to start dropping off the Medicaid rolls”. Was this meant to be due to the economy picking up and thus naturally individuals no longer being eligible for Medicaid, or rather the situation become so dire that legislation would pass changing eligibility requirements forcing constituents off Medicaid. Clearly one answer is far more politically pungent than the latter.

    Roberts said the referenced phrase was meant to refer to the natural effects of recovering from an economic downturn.

    When asked to clarify that he didn’t mean policy change, Roberts stated “now they may get to the point where they do have to change eligibility”.

    Clearly this is immediately sobering as “that’s not a popular thing to do”.

    Of course all of this talk of Medicaid is really up to the Federal Government and the health care reform that is currently working its way through Congress.

    Roberts had reserved opinions on the state’s Fiscal Stability Commission, which has been tasked with providing insight and solutions to the budget crisis.

    “Whether they have the time or the resources to really do something, to really do something really comprehensive, to step back and to study this, and also take into account our local government system, I don’t think they are really doing that.”

    According to Roberts, perhaps the greatest flaw in the Commissions current actions has to do with a lack of reporting on local governments, which is where a lot of taxes are collected, and an absence of a non-partisan comprehensive look at the states revenue system; an audit.

    “We have recommended something more comprehensive, something that tries to take the partisanship out of it… We don’t think the partisan elements need to get involved.”

    My partisan thoughts on how to fix the problem are to come in a later post.

    Transcript of the full interview and a crapy recording after the break.
    (More …)

     
    icon for podpress  Full Roberts Interview on his Paper and Colorado's Budget Tsunami: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
     
  • Colorado's Huge Deficit Not Getting Any Smaller

    Dillon Doyle 8:08 pm on July 7, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , CCEF, debt, defecit, DU, fiscal, money, TABOR,

    So if you haven’t been paying attention to the CO budget, you should start now…

    Here is my attempt to briefly explain (to the best of my ability) the problems. This fiscal year (09-10) the state has to cover $1,800,000,000 of deficit (we started this year ~$384,000,000 in the hole). One might ask how the hell that happened!

    Well, it has to do with a few things.

    Firstly, the TABOR amendment makes it unlawful to increase local property-tax rates without approval of the voters.

    Secondly, in the year 2000 the CO voters passed Amendment 23, which mandated that education funding increased with inflation +1% yearly (the +1% expires 10-11).

    Thirdly, the amount of funds spent on prisons, schools, and medicaid have increased sharply, far outpacing the revenues the state has taken in.

    Because of the way in which our state revenue system is setup, our income (and thus the relative amount of money we can invest in education) is very dependent on the economy, which is good in booms, bad in recession. Many would argue that we don’t tax enough when times are good and tax too much when times are bad (the data for this argument can be found in the CCEF’s report), which I tend to side with.

    A report released today by faculty of our University (http://www.du.edu/economicfuture/) outlines these troubles in far more depth, which includes graphs!

    Most strikingly,

    “the Gallagher Amendment keeping the taxable value of property low and TABOR keeping tax rates from increasing, the property tax share of school funding grows slower than it would other-wise. That growth has not kept pace with Amend-ment 23’s mandated funding increases.”

    Needless to say, according to the authors, we are headed for a “cliff” as is the title of the CCEF report.

    Tomorrow is the first meeting of the Long Term Fiscal Stability Commission on the hill, which is the state’s version of the Center for Colorado’s Economic Future. I can’t wait to see what they have to say, especially in terms of TABOR (more specifically their judgement on the relative merit of TABOR).

    I will write my thoughts on the problem, why I think we got ourselves into this situation, and my suggestions for fixing this mess when I get back (PS I am in DC, and it is awesome!).

    So keep reading, and stay informed and active!

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel